Oh how I love Fiona and her lovely comics.
I’ve blogged this before commenting on how obnoxious I find it’s puritanical subtext and the fact it’s message is indistinguishable from those peddled in Christian-based abstinence propaganda, but it now occurs to me that at least one of the couples depicted is not biologically capable of procreating with each other.
Thus the message makes no fucking sense what so ever; it reduces sex to mere procreation, yet the couple can’t procreate, so is it saying transpeople shouldn’t have sex at all or… something else? I really don’t know the answer; I’m not sure the person who drew it knows the answer either.
So not only is it obnoxious, it’s also internally nonsensical.
It is quite surreal really to see this sort of pro abstinence propaganda come from the other side.
I think that people are projecting what they like on this image: if you wanted to find a pro-abstinence message, it’s there. If it was meant for advocating relationships with sterile people, people could see that. Myself, I think it’s about “you don’t have to have kids if you don’t want to.” Sometimes (not always), people see what they want to see. I think this is one of those cases, so “propaganda” is not really the right word.
(Source: fionafix-it)
Notes:
#[bomb the music industry!] brought me full circle to one of Fiona’s drawings… today is shaping up really well.
